Prev: RE: [GZG] [FT] New NAC ships profiles and fighters Next: Re: [GZG] Little Big horn was: Points systems

Re: [GZG] Re: Points systems

From: "laserlight" <laserlight@q...>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:12:14 -0800
Subject: Re: [GZG] Re: Points systems

Mike Sarno said: 
> [All the VP with the Crown Price]
> is a good scenario. If a player chose to work the
> proposed VP  system like that EVERY time, that would be a
> more than just a bit excessive.

Concur with both parts of that. 
 
> The current default scenario, kill more CPV than you lose,
> is subject to  more cheese-ification than the proposed
> system. I seem to remember a	certain Can-Am game at ECC
> where the US team brought nothing but carriers.

That problem was "massed fighters are unbalanced" (plus some
other factors), not due to the concept of "kill more CPV". 

How about "assign VP to the ENEMY's ships" rather than your
own?  With a limit of +/- 100% of its normal CPV.  Example:
if your enemy has 3 cruisers at 200PV each, any one of them
could be worth 0-400PV as long as the total is still 600.

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

Prev: RE: [GZG] [FT] New NAC ships profiles and fighters Next: Re: [GZG] Little Big horn was: Points systems