Re: [GZG] Re: Points systems

John Atkinson wrote:
> On 1/9/06, Oerjan Ariander <oerjan.ariander@telia.com> wrote:

>>of pocket greasing) to name just a few. As a result, the weapons and
>>vehicles that give the most real-world bang per real-world buck for
nation
>>A might not be cost-effective at all for nation B (if they're able to
>>operate it at all)!
> 
> 
> Was it you that brought up the example once of a third world nation
> wanting tanks and after some study it was determined that the T-55 was
> the closest thing to cost-effective for them because of the nature of
> their probably opposition and the logistical problems associated with
> maintaining anything more sophisticated?

No, it was me. Long chats about this with CinC Royal Thai Army (says she

shamelessly namedropping).

I concur with everything the estimable Oerjan has said so far though.

Zoe

-- 
Zoe & Carmel Brain
http://aebrain.blogspot.com
mailto:aebrain@webone.com.au
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l