RE: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question to you all.....

>-----Original Message-----
>From: gzg-l-bounces@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
>[mailto:gzg-l-bounces@lists.csua.berkeley.edu]On Behalf Of Ah Clem
>Sent: 05 January 2006 02:47
>To: gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
>Subject: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question to you all.....
>
>//snip//
>
>>B) I haven't played this but dislike it in theory.  Same reason as
>>above.  Still arbitrarily limits rotation in a game where the time
>>per turn is not specified.
>>
>>One of the things I like most about FT is it's simplicity.  Please
>>don't go the way of SFB.  I remember when SFB came in a plastic
>>bag.	By the time I gave up in disgust I was lugging around a huge
>>3-ring binder stuffed with rules, revised rules, advanced rules,
>>optional rules, rules errata, etc.
>
>Only one ring binder? That must have been a few editions back.
>
>CJ

Have no fear, there is ABSOLUTELY no intention of FT going down this 
route..... yes, the fact that the rules are spread across multiple 
books is problem, caused by the evolution of the game over time and 
the fact that we are still primarily a miniatures manufacturer rather 
than a book publisher (the books are there to sell the minis, rather 
than vice-versa), but that is why we are working on FT3 as a proper 
all-in-one-place version. I realise that the progress towards it 
probably seems glacially slow (bit of understatement here...) but it 
WILL happen!  ;-)

Jon (GZG)

>_______________________________________________
>Gzg-l mailing list
>Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
>http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l