RE: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question to you all.....

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lI prefer the
FleetBook vector system to cinematic for the most part (for
humans and aliens), and like Indy, have no trouble with the
Rotate-Move-Rotate. I like the feel of the turn sequence and movement
(though I agree that the move/fire dichotomy is annoying at times -
anybody
thought of doing something like isolating all fighter and missile
action,
plus PDS fire I suppose, prior to ship movement and fire?*). The biggest
thing that I've noticed with other players new to the game is that
breaking
them of the mindset that "all space games must act like SFB or BF:G (or
modern day naval/air engagements)" - once they get that out of their
head
then they seem to do fine.



* Proposed Revised Sequence:



1-     Write Orders

2-     Roll Initiative

3-     Move Fighters

4-     Launch Missiles

5-     Allocate Fighter and Missile Attacks

6-     Point Defense Fire

7-     Missile and Fighter Attacks

8-     Move Ships

9-     Ships Fire

10- Turn Ends



While dramatic, the idea just occurred me as I was pondering Impulse
Charts
v. the FT that I like.



I have never tried the EFSB version.



David