Prev: Re: [GZG] 25MM (not quite) SG: Figure Question Next: Re: [GZG] [FT] Repair ships

Re: [GZG] More beta ships

From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:44:02 -0500
Subject: Re: [GZG] More beta ships

Ok, not necessary for the ships, but, with the Fleet Books as the
paradigm,
the romanized form of the original language for fleet designations just
seemed the way to go.

Fiddly-r-us. *ducking pending lawsuit*

The_Beast

> ***
> Beast wrote:
> Would Imperial Spaceforcenavy Ship produce an acronym that would
> offend?  ...Ship of the Imperial Spaceforcenavy?
> ***
>
> Why not just call it ISS for Imperial StarShip? Makes
> sense to me. and IMS for Imperial Merchant Ship. KISS principle.
>
> Ken

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

Prev: Re: [GZG] 25MM (not quite) SG: Figure Question Next: Re: [GZG] [FT] Repair ships