Prev: Re: SaVasku Comment ( was Re: Fire Control lock-on) Next: Re: SaVasku Comment ( was Re: Fire Control lock-on)

Re: Fire Control lock-on musings

From: "Flak Magnet (Tim)" <flakmagnet@c...>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 15:01:13 -0400
Subject: Re: Fire Control lock-on musings

John Leary wrote:

>I just must ask: 
>
>If FCS is sensors, what are the sensors?
>
>If you have 2 1945 radar sets, do they equal
>a 1960s radar set in ability?
>
>Bye for now,
>John L.
>  
>
If you have 2 1960 radar sets, and the ability to allocate them to
different targets or target areas or even the same targets or target
areas, isn't that better than one? 

2 radar sets sweeping the target at alternating intervals gives a
quicker "refresh" rate on what that target is up to, thus increasing the
ability to respond quickly to it's actions.

In the case of weapons systems, that's better firing solutions.

At this point, THIS part of the discussion has come down to arguing PSB,
not whether to include lock-on rolls or not.

--Tim

Prev: Re: SaVasku Comment ( was Re: Fire Control lock-on) Next: Re: SaVasku Comment ( was Re: Fire Control lock-on)