Prev: Re: Fire Control lock-on (was: Re: [FT] squadron suggestions) Next: RE: Fire Control lock-on (was: Re: [FT] squadron suggestions)

Re: [FT] squadron suggestions

From: John Leary <john_t_leary@y...>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:07:45 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [FT] squadron suggestions



--- Doug Evans <devans@nebraska.edu> wrote:

> Mr. Burton West stated:
> Personally I'd like to give defensive bonuses to
> ships with lots of
> thrust left unused at the end of the movement
> phase...
> 
> ...two great minds...
> 
> The_Beast
> 
> 
The logic of having a ship that is not making
any course change, but has a high (unused) thrust,
being more difficult to hit than a target that
is larger, but changing course, is somewhat
difficult to accept.

Suggestion:
Small ships, -1 to the die roll
Mediun ships, no modifier
Large ships, +1 to the die roll (but only a 
natural 6 counts for special effects.)

Bye for now,
John L.

		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail 
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour: 
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html 

Prev: Re: Fire Control lock-on (was: Re: [FT] squadron suggestions) Next: RE: Fire Control lock-on (was: Re: [FT] squadron suggestions)