Prev: Re: [VV] Gate defence Next: RE: [OT]Wither Canada? And Australias Abrahms

Re: [VV] Gate defence

From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@g...>
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 14:31:18 +0100
Subject: Re: [VV] Gate defence

On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 11:08:07 +0000, Samuel Penn <sam@bifrost.demon.co.uk>
wrote:

> There is a big difference between adding to the discussion based
> on your prior experience (and pointing out where that experience
> came from so that people can follow it up if they have the time
> and resources), and telling everyone to shut up because you know
> more than they do.
> 
> The latter is what John did, and that is what I objected to. You
> are doing the former, and I don't have any problem with that.

I have neither the time nor the inclination to recapitulate every word
said about warp point defenses over the course of four very long and
complex novels.  Especially as it is not summarized neatly in
pseudo-dialogue, but is simply demonstrated over and over again in an
orgy of anti-matter explosions.

John
-- 
"Thousands of Sarmatians, Thousands of Franks, we've slain them again
and again.  We're looking for thousands of Persians."
--Vita Aureliani

Prev: Re: [VV] Gate defence Next: RE: [OT]Wither Canada? And Australias Abrahms