Prev: Re: [VV] Vectorverse FTL Next: Re: [VV]Re: [FH] Vectorverse was Re: NAC - American style

[VV]Re: [FH] Vectorverse was Re: NAC - American style

From: Donald Hosford <Hosford.Donald@a...>
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 06:54:39 -0500
Subject: [VV]Re: [FH] Vectorverse was Re: NAC - American style



Laserlight wrote:

>>    Have we desided weather the Earth is going to be in the setting
>>    
>>
>or not?
>
>No Earth.
>  
>
Clears that up. :-)

>  
>
>>    Could this setting be in the same setting as the GZG one?  (Just
>>    
>>
>on
>  
>
>>the other side of the galaxy or something?)
>>    
>>
>
>The other side of the galaxy is a loooooong way away.
>  It can't be "colonies that set off from Earth using human FTL tech
>and got lost" and still be in the same time frame as the GZGverse,
>because without constant immigration you wouldn't have populations
>large enough to be useful in that time frame.	If you want to say
>"it's in the GZGverse but not connected"--eg on the grounds that the
>Ancient Hebrew Starships left Earth with the missing ten tribes or
>something--then that's okay, but I don't see that it makes any
>difference.
>  
>
Ok. Dump that one.

>  
>
>>I like the idea of the long night.  It would explain why there are
>>civilizations all over.  Some just recovered quicker.
>>    
>>
>
>Concur.
>  
>

>How about this?
>
Have a large nation in the past, that covered a good sized area.
Eventually broke up do to a reason lost to time (for now).
After (a few? or several?) centurys surviving worlds started moving 
around again.
The game timeframe could be sometime after this happens.  That way the 
various nations have time to form, etc.

Donald Hosford

>
>  
>

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.2 - Release Date: 1/28/05

Prev: Re: [VV] Vectorverse FTL Next: Re: [VV]Re: [FH] Vectorverse was Re: NAC - American style