Re: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, John Atkinson wrote:

> On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:25:36 +1100, Beth.Fulton@csiro.au
> <Beth.Fulton@csiro.au> wrote:
>
>> other backgrounds. One of the backgrounds I use it in has a power
where
>> their anti-armour is small enough that ammo is no longer a
restriction
>> factor (I'm guessing the same would be true for Star Trek-like
>> background where you just dialup the phaser appropriately). In a
>> background like that it wouldn't be doctrine anymore so something
very
>> different could pan out I'd expect.
>
> So, if you can just dialup the phaser appropriately, then why would
> you ever use it on the lower setting?
>

'cause some of the other settings would presumabley be better at hitting

disprsed infantry (wide area kill), and the "tight beam disintigrate" 
(anti-tank) shot might take a lot more energy out of the power pack. :)

J