Re: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 01:08:21 -0800, Sylvester M. W. <xveers@gmail.com>
wrote:
> There's a couple reasons. Why waste that much battery power
> incernating a single person, when a low setting can still guarentee a
> kill but give you enough charge for another five shots. Another
> possibility is windup. Perhaps it takes a few seconds for the emitter
> to charge to full for the heavy shots, whereas it can cycle faster on
> a lower setting.

OK, then how do we model that differently than the ammo carrying issue?

My point is this:  It is gamey and not taking into account real-world
factors to permit people to shoot off their anti-armor weapons at
every clump of bushes they desire with no thought to the future.

John
-- 
"Thousands of Sarmatians, Thousands of Franks, we've slain them again
and again.  We're looking for thousands of Persians."
--Vita Aureliani