Prev: Re: [FT] sensors Next: [FH]

Re: [FT] sensors

From: Charles Lee <xarcht@y...>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 15:31:44 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [FT] sensors

The bending of light rays at the edges of the micro black hole would be
the easiest as the asmith of the angle of refraction is a coefecient of
a fixed number verses range.

"laserlight@quixnet.net" <laserlight@quixnet.net> wrote:Reading through
other parts of Nyrath's site, I saw discussions of how a
drive plume can be detected from here to Antares, but I didn't notice
anything about how far away you can detect a ship which is using an
Handwavium drive, which (as everyone knows) has no rocket exhaust. 
Let's say you move by generating a small black hole in front of you and
a
negative mass equivalent (generates a push rather than a pull) behind
you. 
a) how would this be detected?
b) how far away could you reasonably expect to detect a ship, just by
its
temperature?

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .

		
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.

Prev: Re: [FT] sensors Next: [FH]