Re: FT Sensor Rules -- Request for Comments [LONG]

Howdy,

Tony Christney wrote:
> It seems to me that the effective ranges are reversed. One would
> expect active sensors to have much greater range than passive.

Doh!  No, it means I lost track of which section I was writing in.

Active is 54", passive is 36", just like FT.  (8-)

> Also, how about having a "bogey" firing using a passive lock
> being treated exactly as if it had just executed an active scan
> attempt.

*nod*  That's a good idea, and makes sense from a logic standpoint,
I'm not sure if it would be too much of a limitation from a
gameplay standpoint.  I'll write it in and playtest it though, and
see what happens.

Thanks!
JGH

-- 
Jerry Han - jhan@warpfish.com - http://www.warpfish.com/jhan - TBFTGOGGI
"The snow is coming down, on our New England town, and it's been falling
all day long; what else is new? What can I do? But sing this Valley
Winter Song, I wrote for you" -- Fountains of Wayne,"Valley Winter Song"