Prev: Re: Magnetic Basing material/steel paper Next: Re: My New Fleet

Re: My New Fleet

From: "Grant A. Ladue" <ladue@c...>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:15:13 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: My New Fleet

> 
> --0-1461854602-1098290809=:48041
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> Nothing is bigger than a SDN.  I designed a TMF 1500 ship for a local
campaign and costs something like 4500 (including cargo spaces).  It
DEFAULTED to being a SDN.
>  
> Also, my pet peev is that everybody compares to SFB or tries to
convert FT to SFB.  SFB needs to die and remain dead!
> 
> "Grant A. Ladue" <ladue@cse.Buffalo.EDU> wrote:
>  What's bigger than an SDN? 
> The Star Fleet Battles designation of Space Control Ship (SCS) might
work.
> 
> 

   Well, you could do that if you like, but it seems unlikely to me that
navies
 that bother to differentiate between heavy and light cruisers are going
to 
 just lump a regular SDN in with a ship twice it's size with 5 times the

 fighters.

   As for SFB, I'm certainly not trumpetting for it, just considering
stealing
 the name from it.  I think I'm going to stick with BCV/CCV/HCV anyhow. 
They
 have the right military tone for me.

  grant

Prev: Re: Magnetic Basing material/steel paper Next: Re: My New Fleet