Prev: Re: (DS): Systems per Class Next: Re: (DS): Systems per Class

Re: (DS): Systems per Class

From: Glenn M Wilson <warbeads@j...>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 15:47:31 PDT
Subject: Re: (DS): Systems per Class

1) PDS counts.
2)PDS is specifically for auotmated anti-GMS work, not manual infantry
killing.

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 15:25:59 -0700 (PDT) Brian B
<greywanderer987@yahoo.com> writes:
>1. Re-read the paragraph above the one that you
>quoted, then tell me the pds doesnt count. 2. The
>problem is with the rule in general, not with
>hair-splitting about whether a specific system
>violates it or not.
>--- owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
><lerchey@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
>> You can do the slammers combat car in DSII without
>breaking the rules as 
>> they are written.  It explicitely states that the
>"free" APSW does NOT 
>> count towards any capacity or size limitations
>issues (Page 11: ALL 
>> MILITARY VEHICLES ARE FITTED WITH ONE "FREE" APSW,
>CAPABLE OF ALL-ROUND 
>> FIRE; THIS WEAPON DOES NOT COUNT TOWARDS ANY WEAPONS
>FIT LIMITATIONS, OR 
>> TAKE UP ANY CAPACITY.).  Thus, your combat car (size
>2) with 3 APSWs is 
>> within the "2 weapons max" limit despite the third
>weapon.  Further, the 
>> PDS is not listed as a "weapon" but rather as a
>"defensive system".  E.G.,
>> it doesn't count as a "weapon" because it can't be
>used to attack anything.
>> 
>> <shrug>
>> 
>> I don't see the problem.
>> ;)
>> 
>> 
>> J
>> 
>> 
>> John K. Lerchey
>> Computer and Network Security Coordinator
>> Computing Services
>> Carnegie Mellon University
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Robertson, Brendan wrote:
>> 
>> > There are practical reasons for allowing more
>SAW/PDS type weapons on the
>> > designs; it lets you build a Slammers combat car
>for example (size 2, 3 x
>> > SAW is DSII and size 2, 3 x PIG in SGII).
>> > It also makes vehicles more effective in close
>assault actions (as only
>> > SAW/PDS weapons can fire in DSII close assaults).
>> >
>> > Brendan
>> > 'Neath Southern Skies
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: John K Lerchey
>[mailto:lerchey@andrew.cmu.edu]
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 7:21 AM
>> >>
>> >> Hm.  I don't see how this is a "consensus" issue,
>unless my reading
>> >> comprehension skills are suffering badly.  I just
>re-read the vehicle
>> >> design rules.  It clearly states that you may
>have one
>> >> *weapon system* per
>> >> size point of the vehicle.  It says nothing about
>limits on
>> >> non-weapons
>> >> other than the fact that they use capacity.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > IMPORTANT: Notice to be read with this E-mail
>> > 1. Before opening any attachments, please check
>them for
>> > viruses and defects.
>> >
>> > 2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may
>contain confidential
>> > information for the use of the intended recipient.
>> >
>> > 3. If you are not the intended recipient, please:
>contact the sender
>> > by return e-mail, to notify the misdirection; do
>not copy, print,
>> > re-transmit, store or act in reliance on this
>e-mail; and delete and
>> > destroy all copies of this e-mail.
>> >
>> > 4. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of
>the sender and are
>> > not a statement of Australian Government policy
>unless otherwise stated.
>> >
>> > 5. Any electronic address published in this
>message is not to be taken as a
>> > conspicuous publication of that electronic
>address.
>> > The Department of Veterans' Affairs does not
>consent to the receipt of
>> > "commercial electronic messages" as that term is
>defined in the Spam Act
>> > 2003.
>> >
>> > 6. If you do not wish to receive further emails of
>this type from the
>> > Department of Veterans' Affairs, please forward
>your reply to this message
>> > to feedback@dva.gov.au with 'Unsubscribe' in the
>subject line.
>> >
>> > 7.  Finally, please do not remove this notice, so
>that any
>> > other readers are aware of these restrictions.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>=====
>"In life, you must try and be the type of person that your dog thinks 
>you are."
>
>- Anonymous
>
>
>	
>		
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Vote for the stars of Yahoo!'s next ad campaign!
>http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/yahoo/votelifeengine/
>

________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!

Prev: Re: (DS): Systems per Class Next: Re: (DS): Systems per Class