Prev: Re: New and Improved Website Next: Re: My own comments on Re: mixing technology force in Dirtside

RE: My own comments on Re: mixing technology force in Dirtside

From: "Robertson, Brendan" <Brendan.Robertson@d...>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:39:34 +1000
Subject: RE: My own comments on Re: mixing technology force in Dirtside

They're good for targeting APC's, as the splash can take out the
dismounted
infantry at long range (as you can't target the infantry directly).
They're also good for taking out ZAD vehicles, as they can't shoot the
subminitions down.

Brendan
'Neath southern skies

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Atkinson [mailto:johnmatkinson@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 1:34 PM
> To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> --- John K Lerchey <lerchey@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
> > So, my breadkdown is as follows...
> > 
> > 4 Command MICVs, 24 MBTs, 12 Tank Destroyers, 12
> > Support (SLAM) tanks, 6 
> > Artillery (plus ammo tenders), 6 APCs (with PA
> > units), 5 ADS, 2 ARV,
> > 8 Recon, 4 Gunships (VTOL).
> 
> Are the SLAM tanks that useful?  I took one look at
> 'em in the rulebook and said "Nope."	Are they that
> effective?  What role do you use them in?  Personally,
> I think it's a bit light on the APC numbers, but total
> infantry elements is adequate.  Big APCs just make me
> nervous, that's all.
> 
> John 

IMPORTANT: Notice to be read with this E-mail 
1. Before opening any attachments, please check them for 
viruses and defects. 

2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential 
information for the use of the intended recipient. 

3. If you are not the intended recipient, please: contact the sender 
by return e-mail, to notify the misdirection; do not copy, print,
re-transmit, store or act in reliance on this e-mail; and delete and 
destroy all copies of this e-mail. 

4. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are 
not a statement of Australian Government policy unless otherwise stated. 

5. Any electronic address published in this message is not to be taken
as a 
conspicuous publication of that electronic address. 
The Department of Veterans' Affairs does not consent to the receipt of 
"commercial electronic messages" as that term is defined in the Spam Act
2003. 

6. If you do not wish to receive further emails of this type from the 
Department of Veterans' Affairs, please forward your reply to this
message 
to feedback@dva.gov.au with 'Unsubscribe' in the subject line. 

7.  Finally, please do not remove this notice, so that any 
other readers are aware of these restrictions.

Prev: Re: New and Improved Website Next: Re: My own comments on Re: mixing technology force in Dirtside