Re: [FT] AMT questions
From: "Grant A. Ladue" <ladue@c...>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 17:18:57 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [FT] AMT questions
>
> Grant wrote:
>
> > >ADFC-controlled PDSs fire as if they were mounted on the ship
protected by
> > >the ADFC (measures the firing range from that ship instead of from
the ship
> > >they're actually on, etc.), so are allowed to engage AMTs
threatening the
> > >protected ship. AMTs work exactly as Plasma Bolts in this respect.
> >
> >So, the ADFC ship or ships need only be within range of *any* of the
ships
> > within the blast radius of the AMT, not just the ship the AMT is
moving
> > towards?
>
> Correct.
>
Ouch. Ok, I'll keep that in mind. I've got a couple of thoughts on
AMT's
that I'd like to hash around a bit and post here. I think the AMT rule
should
mention the specifics of ADFC interaction with AMT's, because it
doesn't seem
clear to me now. My first reading of the rule was that only the blast
radius
PDS's could fire.
Hey, would it be fair to say that when a fighter group is "screening"
a
vessel, the fighter group is "surfing" the drive field of the ship in
order
to stay with it?
grant