Prev: Re: Laserlight's FT Lite Next: Re: Laserlight's FT Lite

RE: Laserlight's FT Lite

From: "Matt Tope" <mptope@o...>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 16:13:42 -0000
Subject: RE: Laserlight's FT Lite

Thanks for the clarification on that Roger, 

Cheers,

Matt Tope

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[mailto:owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU]On Behalf Of Roger Burton
West
Sent: 25 February 2004 16:00
To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: Laserlight's FT Lite

On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 03:45:11PM -0000, Matt Tope wrote:
>PS- I take it Grasers can share fire controls with regular beams and
pulse
>torps, given the relativley low number of FC's used by some of the UN
>capital classes. Or is this not the case?

That's certainly the way it's intended. FT2 made this unclear by having
the "separate FCs for torps" rule; these days I think it can be taken to
be "one FC per ship target, one FC per system target for needle beams".

Roger

Prev: Re: Laserlight's FT Lite Next: Re: Laserlight's FT Lite