Re: [FT] Even more NAC ships
From: Hugh Fisher <laranzu@o...>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 20:24:56 +1100
Subject: Re: [FT] Even more NAC ships
Roger Burton West wrote:
>Mosquito NPV is correct, CPV is 109. However, you're in the
>"inefficient" range for screens - up to ship mass 60 they take 3 mass
>however small the ship.
and Ryan Gill wrote:
>Imho, shields are a Cruiser and above fit. Even in the case of a
>heavy-DD (destroyer leader) that exceeds the older cruiser masses,
>they still don't have shields. Its a question of protection level
>(usually some armor too) balancing out the equation and defining the
>role.
plus some others with similar comments.
I find the screen makes it very effective against ESU, OU,
and FSE light opponents. The screen may not be the most
efficient use of mass, but it's nice to still have protection
when you've burnt the armour off your foes. Also very useful
for those Mosquito crews lurking around the edges of large
scale actions, or (ahem) running away.
On the other hand, yes it's no help when the enemy are
shooting large chunks of metal out of railguns at you.
As I wrote on the web page, these designs are meant to be
interesting, not necessarily efficient. I like the Mossie.
Hugh