Prev: RE: (FT) small vs large ships, was YAFS Next: RE: Starship Troopers

RE: Starship Troopers

From: "David Mihail" <dmihail2@c...>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 18:55:26 -0700
Subject: RE: Starship Troopers

Really, there's no need to get touchy about it.  I certainly didn't mean
to
offend you by offering another view.  Not all of us have been on the
list
since its inception and know that it has been brought up before.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> [mailto:owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU]On Behalf Of Doug Evans
> Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 5:04 PM
> To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: Starship Troopers
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Please stop; this has been on this list before, solved nothing. I've
even
> been pointed to the Kentaurus site several times before.
>
> Leave at, the author was disappointed, and I consider him lacking in
> certain qualities of judgement.
>
> The_Beast
>

Prev: RE: (FT) small vs large ships, was YAFS Next: RE: Starship Troopers