Re: [SG2] weapons
From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 00:14:08 -0500
Subject: Re: [SG2] weapons
At 5:19 PM -0800 11/17/03, John Atkinson wrote:
>--recoiless antitank 90mm gun
>
>Useless. Personally, IMHO the RRs would be replaced
I doubt that a Bradly crew on the receiving end
of a 90mm RR shot would say, useless. I'm sure
the Marines at Hue City didn't think that of
their Ontos' and their 6 105mm RRs.
--
--
Ryan Gill rmgill@SPAMmindspring.com
----------------------------------------------------------
| | | -==----
| O--=- | | /_8[*]°_\
|_/|o|_\_| | _________ | /_[===]_\
/ 00DA61 \ |/---------\| __/ \---
_w/|=_[__]_= \w_ // [_] o[]\\ _oO_\ /_O|_
|: O(4) == O :| _Oo\=======/_O_ |____\ /____|
|---\________/---| [__O_______W__] |x||_\ /_||x|
|s|\ /|s| |s|/BSV 575\|s| |x|-\| |/-|x|
|s|=\______/=|s| |s|=|_____|=|s| |x|--|_____|--|x|
|s| |s| |s| |s| |x| |x|
'60 Daimler Ferret '42 Daimler Dingo '42 Humber MkIV (1/3)
----------------------------------------------------------