RE: Linked scenarios for ECC next year?

There are ways around that.  Each player starts with a pool (the force
you'd
normally take, along with some reserves).  Even as you take casualties,
you'd still have a little something for the next scenario.  Also, after
every game, you roll dice for each unit that was killed/destroyed to see
if
it was only a temporary condition (after all, mostly dead is still
partly
alive...).  Granted, that one kind of breaks some other rules... but if
everyone agrees to it before hand...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> [mailto:owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU]On Behalf Of Roger Burton
> West
> Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2003 11:57 PM
> To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: Linked scenarios for ECC next year?
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 12:44:41PM -0400, Damond Walker wrote:
> >    Anyone interested in running some linked scenarios for next
> years ECC?
> >The concept would be that the results of the previous scenario
> would have an
> >impact on the following one.
>
> Sounds good... The only potential problem, it seems to me, is the same
> as with a campaign system normally: if side A wins one game, it'll
have
> an advantage in the next one, and if it keeps winning then the later
> games are pretty lop-sided.
>
> R