Re: [DS] Linking scenarios

Thomas Barclay wrote:

> As it turned out, the SG game saw most of the 
> chit play, although the DS game also saw some 
> chit play. I think FT was just straight up, IIRC. 

What was the order in which they were played, and did that have an 
effect on chit play?

> This style of linked play makes for *very* 
> interesting campaigns. 

It sounds quite interesting.  The chit system seems an easy way to have 
scenarios which are "sort of" linked w/o too much work.  But it doesn't 
really replace a campaign or series of scenarios in which the outcome of

one affects the next, or is there another part to it that accomplishes
this?

Cheers,
-- Jerry Acord
acord@imagiware.com