Re: [DS2] Multi-barrel cheese question

Here's my take on it:

--- CS Renegade <njg@csrenegade.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> Is it permissable to describe a single weapon on a 
> vehicle as "quick-firing" or "multi-barrel" and put
> multiple weapons in the design, even though only a
> single barrel or shroud features on the model?

As long as you pay the capacity for multiple systems,
and let your opponent know that that's what you've
done, why not?
 
> If it is, what conditions, restrictions or
> advantages should apply?

None that I can think of onther than those already in
place for multiple mount systems.

> On a vaguely-related note, is it permissable to
> justify a GMS that does not appear on the figure by
> describing it as "through-barrel" in the design?

Same concept seems to apply.  If you've paid the
points and capacity for both a GMS and a direct fire
weapon, why not?  It only strikes me as cheesy if you
don't point it out to your opponent.

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
http://platinum.yahoo.com