Prev: Re: [FT] CPV vs. NPV Next: Re: [GZG-OLC] February Update

Re: [FT] CPV vs. NPV

From: Brian Bilderback <greywanderer987@y...>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:49:08 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [FT] CPV vs. NPV


--- Allan Goodall <agoodall@hyperbear.com> wrote:

> >You also bring up a good point, Allan.  Will the
> same
> >point system work equally well in Vector as in
> Cinematic?
> 
> That's a really, really good question...

Thanks.
 
> The short answer is "no". 

I suspected as much.

One arc weapons are
> underpriced in vector. Faster
> ships are overpriced (or is it slower ships are
> underpriced?) in vector. 

And those were also the two shortcomings I suspected.

I have some thoughts regarding movement, but I need to
go over the FT rules for construction, specifically
WRT engine mass.  My books are in storage, can anyone
forward me the rules for calculating engine mass?

=====
Qui me amat, amet et canem meum.

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day
http://shopping.yahoo.com

Prev: Re: [FT] CPV vs. NPV Next: Re: [GZG-OLC] February Update