Re: (fwd) Re: [FT] F***ters [was: Operational game]
From: "Imre A. Szabo" <ias@s...>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 22:42:24 -0500
Subject: Re: (fwd) Re: [FT] F***ters [was: Operational game]
> In other words, you launched your missiles too early and paid the cost
for
> it <shrug>.
No I didn't. What killed me was his four Gorshikov's that launched the
same
time I did. Those strike cuirsers can be very nasty. If I had waited I
would have still have had 3 gutted Jerez's... The ESU fleet can do
Salvo
missiles right. Gorshikov's with Kamorov's for picking off decoys and
FB1
described Beijing B's ADFC varient for Anti-fighter defense make a nasty
force to reckon with. Try 3,000 points with 2 Kamorov's, 4 Gorshikov's,
2
Beijing B ADFC's, and 4 Lenovs...
> Mind you, just like Jon T. the playtesters pick up a lot of
interesting
> ideas on the various open GZG-related mailing lists (including this
one -
> remember the "all stuff posted here is the intellectual property of
GZG"
bit
> in the "welcome to this mailing list" post you got when you
subscribed?),
so
> don't be surprised if the 'official' fighter-balance fix resembles
some of
> the stuff you've seen here :-)
Hopefully not the chart and/or the PDS percentage of mass schemes. I'd
rather just have a lower mass ADFC (mass 1) and more escort varients
that
give a few weapons for ADFC and more PDS. Or the second PDS phase.
ias