Re: [SG] Bounding advance
From: Roger Books <books@j...>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 09:57:40 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [SG] Bounding advance
On 6-Nov-02 at 09:52, laserlight@quixnet.net (laserlight@quixnet.net)
wrote:
> From: Allan Goodall agoodall@hyperbear.com
>
> >This will result in the bounding group being slower to move than a
> non-bounding opponent. This would represent fatigue and the slower
bounding
> system. The house rule you suggested wouldn't have this effect.
>
> Except the house rule I suggested would have the units making a single
> combat move each turn, instead of two normal moves.
So simultaneous fire or roll QD for first fire?
Roger Books