Re: WW2 weapons

man, 2002-10-21 kl. 17:44 skrev Allan Goodall:
> In your case, I'd allow all 4 weapons to fire at once.

In this case I wouldn't "allow" it, they would _have to_ be fired at
once....
> 
> other (I suppose what I really _should_ do is roll one QD and have the
Firecon
> Dice rolled separately).

Isn't that the same as Tom's suggestion?
> 
> However, I also have Kryomek Grav/GEV vehicles I use as APCs. These
have twin
> mounted rotary cannons/MGs. For these firing, I've always allowed QD +
FP Die
> + FP Die. This is what I'd allow for your quad guns in a machine
gun-like
> setting. If you were firing your quad at a fast moving aircraft, I'd
probably
> more likely allow 4 QD + FCD rolls.
> 

Yes, this makes sense!

> 
> 
> You can treat them as a machine gun, like the dual rotary MGs/cannons
on my
> grav APCs. This would allow you to roll QD + D12 + D12 + D12 + D12
(assuming
> D12 Firepower). Okay, so maybe the firepower should even be higher
than a D12
> to be totally realistic, but it would give you a reasonable effect. On
average
> you'd roll something like 30 points total divided by the range die.

This actually would make me think of going out to ba a flakvierling...
pieces of the russian army was all over the place.. lol!

> Oh, and be sure to treat these as terror weapons! Any unit of Regular
and
> below have to test versus panic when fired on by this gun.

Yes, that would make sense as well - i would be scared sh**less!!

These are good ideas as well - I think we have some good points to work
on!


-- 
Mvh
Claus Paludan