Re: [SG2] Artillery Errata???
From: "Richard Kirke" <richardkirke@h...>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 16:37:37 +0000
Subject: Re: [SG2] Artillery Errata???
D6 would seem to make a lot more sense, if not D4, after all if they are
of
SADDARM type they will be all but useless against infantry
Richard
>Chris pointed something out to me. General Purpose artillery rounds do
>D8/D8
>impact versus dispersed/armoured targets. Anti-personnel rounds do
D12/D8,
>and
>anti-armour do D6/D12x2.
>
>What's the point of having GP rounds, if they do the same impact versus
>armour
>as anti-personnel but have lower anti-personnel impact?
>
>Is this, perhaps, a typo and anti-personnel should be D12/D6 versus
>dispersed/armour?
>
>
>Allan Goodall agoodall@hyperbear.com
>http://www.hyperbear.com
>
>"We come into the world and take our chances
> Fate is just the weight of circumstances
> That's the way that Lady Luck dances
> Roll the bones." - N. Peart
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx