Prev: Re: [DS2] Question About Spotting Mine Fields Next: [OT] NBS

Re: [SG2] Artillery Errata???

From: "Richard Kirke" <richardkirke@h...>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 16:37:37 +0000
Subject: Re: [SG2] Artillery Errata???

D6 would seem to make a lot more sense, if not D4, after all if they are
of 
SADDARM type they will be all but useless against infantry

Richard

>Chris pointed something out to me. General Purpose artillery rounds do 
>D8/D8
>impact versus dispersed/armoured targets. Anti-personnel rounds do
D12/D8, 
>and
>anti-armour do D6/D12x2.
>
>What's the point of having GP rounds, if they do the same impact versus

>armour
>as anti-personnel but have lower anti-personnel impact?
>
>Is this, perhaps, a typo and anti-personnel should be D12/D6 versus
>dispersed/armour?
>
>
>Allan Goodall			agoodall@hyperbear.com
>http://www.hyperbear.com
>
>"We come into the world and take our chances
>  Fate is just the weight of circumstances
>  That's the way that Lady Luck dances
>  Roll the bones." - N. Peart

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx

Prev: Re: [DS2] Question About Spotting Mine Fields Next: [OT] NBS