Re: [SG2] Cover Penetration Question for all you Armour Experts
From: Ryan M Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 16:26:33 -0400
Subject: Re: [SG2] Cover Penetration Question for all you Armour Experts
At 3:05 PM -0500 8/28/02, Allan Goodall wrote:
>
>Would a proper position (made from packed earth, I take it?) be mostly
>impervious to anti-tank fire or completely impervious?
>
>Sand is completely useless? Not surprising, but quite interesting. I'll
take
>that into account.
I'd expect that a large layer of sand would be great for absorbing
the energy. A berm pushed up around the tank will be good for
nothing. a few feet being the useless amount. 10 meters of
sand...really good.
--
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
- Ryan Montieth Gill '01 Honda Insight -
- rmgill@SPAmindspring.com '85 CB700S -
- ryan.gill@SPAMturner.com '76 Chevy Monte Carlo -
- www.mindspring.com/~rmgill '72 Honda CB750 -
- '60 Daimler FV701H Mk2/3 -
- '42 Daimler Scout Car Mk II -
- I speak not for CNN, nor they for me -
----------------------------------------------------------------
- The director of Home Security encourages you to -
- turn in your neighbor & spy on your friends. -
----------------------------------------------------------------
- C&R-FFL / Protect your electronic rights! \ EFF-ACLU -
- SAF & NRA/ Join the EFF! http://www.eff.org/ \ DoD #0780 -