RE: Scouts and dinky armoured cars
From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 09:42:29 -0400
Subject: RE: Scouts and dinky armoured cars
At 6:51 AM +0200 8/21/02, Oerjan Ohlson wrote:
>
>>Another option is to consider all armor one vechiles
>>to be 'unsrmored' with a piece of boilerplate stuck
>>on the front.
>
>That's precisely what the rules currently say.
Which is not granular enough to reflect current vehicle design or old
vehicle design. Another problem with the details of the vehicle
design rules.
--
Ryan Gill rmgill@SPAMmindspring.com
----------------------------------------------------------
| | | -==----
| O--=- | | /_8[*]°_\
|_/|o|_\_| | _________ | /_[===]_\
/ 00DA61 \ |/---------\| __/ \---
_w/|=_[__]_= \w_ // [_] o[]\\ _oO_\ /_O|_
|: O(4) == O :| _Oo\=======/_O_ |____\ /____|
|---\________/---| [__O_______W__] |x||_\ /_||x|
|s|\ /|s| |s|/BSV 575\|s| |x|-\| |/-|x|
|s|=\______/=|s| |s|=|_____|=|s| |x|--|_____|--|x|
|s| |s| |s| |s| |x| |x|
'60 Daimler Ferret '42 Daimler Dingo '42 Humber MkIV (1/3)