RE: Scouts and dinky armoured cars

--- "Robertson, Brendan"
<Brendan.Robertson@dva.gov.au> wrote:
> > DS2 p.10 is quite clear that a vehicle with
> frontal armour 1 would count as 
> > "softskinned" (armour 0) against fire from any
> other direction.
> > Oerjan
> 
> Hmmm.... misunderstanding on my part.  Makes size 1
> combat walkers even more
> useless.
 Brendan

Not really, 'front' is 180 degrees, as is the 'back'.
Problem solved!
Another option is to consider all armor one vechiles
to be 'unsrmored' with a piece of boilerplate stuck
on the front.

Bye for now,
John L.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs