Re: Tomb's Rating System

TomB
> > That's a first cut at a more detailed assessment.

KarlHeinz said:
> You have written up a pretty ambitious list. How many people do you
think
> would answer that for any number of canon nations ? I certainyl know
I
> wouldn't have the time and patience to do it.

Ah, but remember the "obsessive-compulsive" thread a while ago?  Some
of us would do it.  Now, someone would still have to collate it, a
task for which I'm not vlunteering

However, we'd still have to relate it to the tabletop.	I'd suggest
starting by developing ratings for SG platoons:

% quality Y/G/B/O/R (the way JohnA does)
effect of quality on kit (ie veteran units often acquire unauthorized
weapons)
% leadership 3/2/1
average actual strength as % of TO strength
Relative quality of support units (ie are your engineers, MPs,
pioneers better, worse, or same as rifle squad)
Availability of support units
Quality of combat vehicles (are you driving an M1 or PzkwIII)
Availabililty of combat vehicles (do you have just the one M1, or 50
MkIIIs)
Are your electronics +1/+0/-1 compared to everyone else?
Same for guidance
Ditto ECM

etc