Re: [FT] Matter Transmitter
From: Michael Llaneza <maserati@e...>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 18:00:25 -0700
Subject: Re: [FT] Matter Transmitter
Capturing an enemy transmitter also has the benefit that his other
stations might still consider it a trusted transmitter. At least for
long enough to send troops or WMD through.
KH.Ranitzsch@t-online.de wrote:
>1) Support ground operations: Drop an advance party by conventional
>means. They set up a portable receiving station and you can transmit in
>the troops. Or have special forces take an enemy transmitter station
>and switch it to receive the attackers' troops.
>2) Boarding actions: similar to case 1, send in an advance party to set
>up a receiver.
>3/4/6) No direct use as weapons, but as Noam also suggested, use
>'magazine ships' to refill light front line
>gunships/carriers/minelayers.
>
--
These constitutional guarantees can not be estimated too highly, or
protected too sacredly. The reader of history knows that for many weary
ages the people suffered for the want of them; it would not only be
stupidity, but madness in us not to preserve them.