Re: Odd armour developments
From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 12:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Odd armour developments
--- Thomas Barclay <kaladorn@magma.ca> wrote:
> having to hump 10 miles with a heavy rucksack
> and a full combat loadout including ammo for
> the support weapons. Not like you're going to
> be happy in any event, but if you've got more
> hair than required, you're going to be even less
> happy.
>
> Ah the joys of being an infanteer (I noticed the
> armoured recce types always seemed to drive if
> the distance was more than about 10 yards....
> lazy bunch of buggers....and the fact they liked
> to keep beer in the APCs wasn't lost on us
> gropos either....)!
Keep reminding me why I want to stay mechanized. :)
Actually, I'm considering reenlisting for Ft. Lewis to
check out this IBCT concept (but my window don't open
for another. . . year and 2 months so I've got plenty
of time to hash out whether it's that or FRG again).
John
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com