RE: Re: [SG2] Assaulting from IP
From: "Chrissa Mower" <chrissa@a...>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 18:43:02 -0600
Subject: RE: Re: [SG2] Assaulting from IP
From: KH.Ranitzsch@t-online.de
>The examples you discussed with a +1 all had a better probability of
success than two separate tests. So this is on the generous side. From
what I have occasionally read, many consider SG morale to be somewhat
over-generous. If you think so, too, you may prefer the +2 modifier.
The morale system *is* over-generous, in the sense that losing
casualties
does not affect your confidence levels as often or as severely as they
should. That's a separate topic, though, and Allen has house rules on
his
site already.
I think the penalty for "leaving cover" and the penalty for "closing to
close assault" could reasonably be thought of as overlapping. If you
were
in hard cover (behind a wall) but not IP, you wouldn't get an extra IP
penalty for initiating close assault, right?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .