Re: [FT] Filling in a Gap...with PSB
From: Charles Taylor <nerik@m...>
Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 20:12:25 +0100
Subject: Re: [FT] Filling in a Gap...with PSB
In message <F32A2DreBBsQwY6YHki0000b593@hotmail.com>
"Brian Bilderback" <bbilderback@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >From: "Laserlight" <laserlight@quixnet.net>
>
> >Well, for mass 2 ships, put a drive and a hull box and make them
> >missile goalies. That's about it.
>
> Ugh. that's exactly the all-or-nothing conundrum I was hoping to
avoid.
>
> >I assume that a fighter is inherently short range, limited life
> >support etc, wheras a ship has effectively unlimited endurance. But
> >that's just my POV.
>
> True, but that leaves out a whole slew of different craft - light
interface
> shuttles/landers, pleasure craft, landing craft, etc. I have definite
ideas
> for how to create such ships for FT/DS interface, but pure FT
stats/rules
> for them don't exist.
>
> Kirk's ideas give me a start, but aren't translatable as is due to
the mass
> difference.
>
> 3B^2
>
Given that such craft could well have limited endurance (like fighters,
but maybe longer), but may only be as manoeuvrable as ships. I also
would like such rules, but my own attempts have been less than
satisfactory up to now :-(
Charles