Prev: Re: [SG] Artillery Next: [FT] Filling in a Gap

Re: MURPHY AT WAR

From: "Adam Benedict Canning" <dahak@d...>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 21:12:26 +0100
Subject: Re: MURPHY AT WAR

> Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 13:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
> From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@yahoo.com>
>
> - --- "K.H.Ranitzsch" <KH.Ranitzsch@t-online.de> wrote:
> > - Strategic intelligence indicates there is a strong
> > enemy force cloes by.
> > Trouble is, your own recce can't find them
>
> Reverse problem:
>
> You're trying to report up the presence of enemy armour
> (which isn't supposed to be here, just light troops).
>
> Your chain of command insists that SIGINT does not
> indicate the presence of enemy armour.
>
> You point out that you can see 3 tanks 400 meters
> away.
>
> Your chain of command says "That is not a SIGINT
> indicator."

That's HUMINT isn't it. And you know what they say about Military
Intelligence.:)

Prev: Re: [SG] Artillery Next: [FT] Filling in a Gap