Prev: [OT] Who plays Harpoon, was Re: Fighters Next: Re: fighters (shorter than the last rant)

Re: Fighters

From: John Leary <john_t_leary@y...>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 18:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Fighters


--- Tomb <tomb@dreammechanics.com> wrote:

> How about this idea:
> Std Interceptor -> Std Fighter cost, no effect vs.
> ships, better vs
> fighters (standard rules)
> Std Interceptor with Standoff package - add +1 (or
> 2?) pt per
> interceptor, attack range 12" but attacks at range
> are resolved as
> standard attacks (don't get interceptor bonuses),
> attacks in close get
> bonus, no effect vs. ships
> And of course you can buy fast/heavy/long range on
> top as desired...
> making for one fighter that is very painful to lose
> if it strays to
> close to a PB or an ADFC escort....

How about a better idea, instead of reinventing the 
wheel, just say that the interceptors get to 
shoot first in the combat.

A far less messy concept that does not mess with
costs and rules.

Bye for now,
John L. 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience


Prev: [OT] Who plays Harpoon, was Re: Fighters Next: Re: fighters (shorter than the last rant)