Prev: RE: Re: [FT] back to fighters Next: Re: [FT] back to fighters

RE: [FT] Fighter combat

From: "Brian Bilderback" <bbilderback@h...>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 07:19:56 -0700
Subject: RE: [FT] Fighter combat

Charles Taylor wrote:

>I _think_ fighters were given extra endurance to enable them to make
use
>of the secondary movement rule introduced in Fleet Book 1.

Could the Secondary MovementRule be part of why fighters are
overpowered?  
Could making it optional be a way of moderating fighter power?

3B^2

_________________________________________________________________


Prev: RE: Re: [FT] back to fighters Next: Re: [FT] back to fighters