Prev: RE: [FT] Single-shot Fighter combat Next: Brian's fighter idea

Re: Brian's fighter idea

From: Michael Llaneza <maserati@e...>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 17:23:55 -0700
Subject: Re: Brian's fighter idea

Post of the year. Tomb defines the points of controversy, and then 
defines a metasystem to accomodate them all, causing the controversy to 
vanish like a term which has been factored out.

Tomb wrote:

>One interesting thought would be to try to define things which fit in
>different fighter genres. That might give us an idea of how each genre
>balances. 
>
>Human pilots (morale)
>vs. 
>Robotic fighters (no morale)
>
>  
>
<snip>

>But maybe that's a too revolutionary thought... that there should be a
>way to get the beast of all worlds....
>
>Tomb. 
>
>  
>


Prev: RE: [FT] Single-shot Fighter combat Next: Brian's fighter idea