Prev: Banned weapons (was Re: Its Doctrine, Scouting and Tactics not Fighters) Next: RE: Fighters options please

RE: Re: Fighters options please

From: Brian Burger <yh728@v...>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 15:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: RE: Re: Fighters options please

On Thu, 9 May 2002, Brian Bilderback wrote:

> laserlight
> 
> >Afterthought--if you chose "X CEF/attack" correctly, it would also
explain 
> >why SDNs and such have those fighters--that way the fighters can get 
> >carried in close enough to be able to make 2-3 attacks instead of 1.
> 
> That thought had occurred to me too.

The more I think about this "x CEF per anti-shipping attack" idea, the
more I like it. It leaves the bulk of the rules intact, changing only
one
aspect of fighter operations, and those who don't like it will also find
it easy to ignore... It even gives those SDN/BDN squadrons a reason to
exist!

I just wish I had spare time for test games right now! (Moving, work &
flight school are destroying my free time!)

Brian - yh728@victoria.tc.ca - 
- http://wind.prohosting.com/~warbard/games.html -

> 
> 3B^2
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
> http://www.hotmail.com
> 


Prev: Banned weapons (was Re: Its Doctrine, Scouting and Tactics not Fighters) Next: RE: Fighters options please