Prev: Re: FB designs & fighters (& strawmen) Next: Re: FB designs & fighters

Re: FB designs & fighters

From: Roger Books <books@j...>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 15:43:50 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: FB designs & fighters

Allan Goodall <agoodall@att.net> wrote:

> The problem, to get back to the essential issue, is the costing of
> fighters. As we have shown, FB1 ships are well balanced against each
> other,

I will point out this is not quite true.  A large ship will generally
beat an equivalent point value of smaller ships.  That was the
issue that (FB^2?) was taking advantage of when he accepted my
challange of showing the game is broken for non-fighter based 
ships.	He didn't go quite big enough and designed a ship
extremely vulnerable to SMs even with 21 PDSes.

Prev: Re: FB designs & fighters (& strawmen) Next: Re: FB designs & fighters