Re: Fighters

Alfie Finch wrote:

 >>-----Original Message-----
 >>From: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
 >>[mailto:owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU]On Behalf
 >>Of Ray Forsythe
 >>Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 11:21 PM
 >>To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
 >>Subject: Re: Fighters
 >>
 >>
 >>Alfie Finch wrote:
 >>
 >>
 >>>We experimented with allowing ADFC controlled
 >>>
 >>defences engage
 >>
 >>>any enemy fighter group whether they were attacking
 >>>
 >>friendlies
 >>
 >>>or not, and also allowing ADFC controlled defences
 >>>
 >>to engage at
 >>
 >>>9 MU (not both rule changes simultaneously though). This
 >>>generally led to wholesale slaughter of the
 >>>
 >>fighters against any
 >>
 >>>fleet fielding ADFC systems until players got used
 >>>
 >>to holding
 >>
 >>>their fighters off at considerable range until they
 >>>
 >>were ready
 >>
 >>>to commit in a large group.
 >>>
 >>>It also wouldn't solve the FB1 ships issue with no ADFC NAC
 >>>vessels and mostly ADFC systems only apearing as
 >>>
 >>known variants.
 >>
 >>The NAC Furious class escort cruiser seems to have an ADFC.
 >>
 >>
 >>
 > I meant FSE...NAC has Minerva/A and Tacoma/A variants with ADFC
 > as well :)
 >
 >
 >

Oh, ok.  Actually, does anyone find it slightly wierd that the most
missile
happy faction in FB1 has no ADFC designs listed at all?

-- 
Ray Forsythe - erf2@gte.net - www.wombatzone.com