Prev: Re: Armour Piercing 201 (Advanced Ceramics) Next: Re: [OT]Stupid question about sloped armour

RE: RE: [OT] wargaming at work (was Steel Wariors)

From: "Richard Kirke" <richardkirke@h...>
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 09:31:37 +0000
Subject: RE: RE: [OT] wargaming at work (was Steel Wariors)

Grrrr Now I'm REALLY jealous!

>Tony's boss: "Tony, we've got a tough one for you.  We want you to
write a 
>game of futuristic ground combat, aimed at a brighter audience than the

>Warhammer crowd."
>Tony: "Gee, that sounds pretty eas^h^h^h...tough."
>TB: "We want it to be kind of turn based, kind of simultaneous
movement.  
>Lord knows how you're going to solve that, but we're counting on you."
>Tony: "Kind of an integrated turn sequence, so to speak?  Alternating 
>activations within a turn?"
>TB: "Exactly!	Brilliant.  And we need for you to design models for the

>tanks and infantry.  Now, we may even go so far as to have some sort of

>metal playing pieces licensed, so you'll need to find out what kinds of

>things not only look good on a screen, but can also be cast."
>Tony: "Well sir, I've got a pretty--"
>TB: "Pretty full plate, I know, but we're relying on you.  We've hired
a 
>masseuse to help you deal with the stress...and of course there's a
major 
>bonus if you can pull this off."

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


Prev: Re: Armour Piercing 201 (Advanced Ceramics) Next: Re: [OT]Stupid question about sloped armour