Prev: Re: Dune Next: Re: OT: Documented source of the U.S. Army's use of of Smallpox

RE: Dune

From: "B Lin" <lin@r...>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 10:23:43 -0600
Subject: RE: Dune

I second that.	The newer version definitely follows the story better,
although some of the effects and costumes of the first seem better. The
longer length allows some of the story plots to be further developed
than the shorter movie version.

--Binhan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Don M [mailto:dmaddox1@hot.rr.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:22 AM
> To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: Dune 
> 
> 
> Zorg,
>	 I own a copy (from the Sci-fi Channel)
> it is by far allot closer to the books. I like it
> more than the cinematic movie of a few
> years back. I'd say go for it if it is the full
> six hour mini series.
> 
> Don
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Zorg Industies" <mr_zorg@lycos.co.uk>
> To: "GZG List" <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 11:01 AM
> Subject: OT: Dune
> 
> 
> > Hi :)
> >
> > I noticed that there were 3 videos fr Dune th TV series in 
> blockbuster,
> but
> > would invite honest opinions before I shell out my hard 
> earned cash :)
> >
> > Anyone seen them and care to comment
> >
> > Ta in advance,
> >
> > Zorg
> 


Prev: Re: Dune Next: Re: OT: Documented source of the U.S. Army's use of of Smallpox