Prev: RE: [OT] Sea Leopard Next: RE: [OT] Sea Leopard

Re: [OT] Sea Leopard

From: Allan Goodall <agoodall@a...>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:05:50 -0500
Subject: Re: [OT] Sea Leopard

On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 13:04:24 -0700, "Brian Bilderback"
<bbilderback@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Ok, first of all, if you can show me in quotations where I ever said
"Tanks 
>were not useful to the japanese,"  I'll quit ever making any comment on
the 
>list, because my Other Voices have been talking out of turn.

You said, "Of course, most of the terrain they fought on didn't beget
huge
North Africa/Russian Steppe-style tank battles, either." Someone pointed
out
that they fought in Manchuria and Korea, large chunks of land in
themselves,
much of which is conducive to tank operations.

So, the question now becomes one of how much terrain is found in
Manchuria and
Korea versus Burma, other parts of Indochina, and all the islands that
the
Japanese fought over. Or, how much is "good tank terrain".

Regardless, before someone starts counting up square miles of tank
friendly
terrain, could you guys take it off list?

Allan Goodall		       agoodall@hyperbear.com
http://www.hyperbear.com

"At long last, the earthy soil of the typical, 
unimaginable mortician was revealed!" 


Prev: RE: [OT] Sea Leopard Next: RE: [OT] Sea Leopard