Prev: RE: [OT] Sea Leopard Next: Mercs and WMDs

RE: [OT] Sea Leopard

From: "Brian Bilderback" <bbilderback@h...>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 08:59:25 -0700
Subject: RE: [OT] Sea Leopard

OK, that makes sense.  Armor wasn't their strong suite, was it?  Of
course, 
most of the terrain they fought on didn't beget huge North
Africa/Russian 
Steppe-style tank battles, either.

3B^2

>From: "Tony Francis" <tony.francis@kuju.com>
>Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
>To: <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
>Subject: RE: [OT] Sea Leopard
>Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:46:18 +0100
>
>If I've read it right, he's referring to the Chi-Ha tank which the
Japanese 
>used in WW2. 'Twasn't very good, as tanks go ...
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brian Bilderback [mailto:bbilderback@hotmail.com]
> > Sent: 22 April 2002 15:29
> > To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> > Subject: Re: [OT] Sea Leopard
> >
> >
> > Barry Cadwgan
> >
> > >Tremble in fear, Chi-ha, tremble in fear...
> >
> > Ummm.... is this an Aussie thing, or am I going to get
> > ridiculed by everyone
> > for not getting the reference?
> >
> > 3B^2
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
> > http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
> >
> >

_________________________________________________________________


Prev: RE: [OT] Sea Leopard Next: Mercs and WMDs