Prev: Re: Blimp Bombing Next: Re: Slow planes was: Battle blimps

RE: Slow planes was: Battle blimps

From: Ryan M Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 13:47:46 -0400
Subject: RE: Slow planes was: Battle blimps

At 4:27 PM +1000 4/19/02, Derek Fulton wrote:
>At 09:32  19/04/02 +1000, Beth wrote:
>>Then again satellite coverage may make that a bit
>>redundant.
>
>But the Blimps provide almost satellite like cover at a much reduced 
>cost, so it wouldn't be redundant just cheaper :)

And far easier to retask for fleet tactical operations.

-- 
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
- Ryan Montieth Gill			     '01 Honda Insight -
- rmgill@mindspring.com 			    '85 CB700S -
- ryan.gill@turner.com			 '76 Chevy Monte Carlo -
- www.mindspring.com/~rmgill		       '72 Honda CB750 -
-				      '60 Daimler FV701H Mk2/3 -
-				   '42 Daimler Scout Car Mk II -
-	      I speak not for CNN, nor they for me	       -
----------------------------------------------------------------
-    Smart ID cards in the US, Smart ID cards in Hong Kong,    -
-		      what is the difference?		       - 
----------------------------------------------------------------
-  C&R-FFL  /  Protect your electronic rights!	  \ EFF-ACLU   -
- SAF & NRA/  Join the EFF!  http://www.eff.org/   \ DoD #0780 -	 

Prev: Re: Blimp Bombing Next: Re: Slow planes was: Battle blimps