Prev: Re: Slow planes was: Battle blimps Next: RE: Slow planes was: Battle blimps

RE: RE: Nukes

From: "laserlight@q..." <laserlight@quixnet.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 12:55:16 -0400
Subject: RE: RE: Nukes


>Too bad they only show relatively large weapons. Would be more
interesting to see 10-50 KT.

Yep--more likely to happen, but slightly less worrisome if it does.  I'd
only be "immediately downwind" from most of the targets around here
(Norfolk/Virginia Beach), instead of "within the blast radius".

Or maybe that would make it "*more* worrisome"...

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at


Prev: Re: Slow planes was: Battle blimps Next: RE: Slow planes was: Battle blimps